PARANORMAL INVESTIGATION IN HAMPSHIRE AND SOUTHERN ENGLAND
Are you at a haunted location, or are you aware of one with a high level of recent paranormal activity? Do you have a location that requires a paranormal investigation ? I am currently in Hampshire, Southern England, but I am willing to travel throughout the U.K or Europe.
At your request I will conduct a professional objective paranormal investigation. There is no charge for this service. I will never reveal the exact location or names of people involved unless given express permission. I employ a combination of high tech equipment, research, and most importantly knowledge and experience.
I do not attempt to prove or disprove a haunting, but to collect and assess information and provide an explanation based not on belief but on evidence and apply critical thinking to my paranormal research.
Please e mail me at firstname.lastname@example.org so we can discuss matters further. I will respond within 24 hours. I am based in Hampshire, but I can travel throughout Southern England, London, Surrey, Dorset, Wiltshire, Berkshire or further afield to conduct a paranormal investigation.
To use scientific methodology to provide credible evidence of a haunting, specifically that of a conscious entity that has survived physical death
To dispel the myths, misinformation and erroneous evidence pertaining to the investigation of haunting’s and the paranormal
Unjustifiable claims resulting from the use of electronic monitoring equipment
False photographic anomalies
Unverified Psychic claims
Separation of spiritual investigation from scientific based paranormal research
To assist through education
No legitimate paranormal investigator will claim to be able to remove spirits should evidence of one be found. Assistance is only provided in the form of helping to validate and understand your experience and to educate as to the true nature of paranormal phenomena and hauntings
8 step investigative process
Establish a reason to instigate an investigation
What is the nature of the occurrence?
What is its frequency?
What do the witnesses believe it is?
Did they have a interest in the paranormal before the incident occurred?
Are they aware if the previous occupants of the location experienced the same occurrences?
Do they watch television shows about the paranormal?
Are they aware of the history of the property?
Is there any physical proof?
What does the client expect as a result of the investigation?
Does the client have an ulterior motive for wanting a location to be haunted such as a financial incentive if it is a commercial property?
2) Research location
Research the property based on the information already provided
Verify this information through independent means and expand on it
Research immediate vicinity of location and determine if there is any historical, geographical or geological relevance
Determine if they are any myths, or legends associated with the location or its vicinity and if they have any factual basis
3) Physical investigation
Determine locations of maximum activity
Identify and record potential physical causes for paranormal phenomena or hauntings
Attempt to recreate evidence that has been reported as paranormal prior to investigation.
Record general physical conditions for future evidence assessment
Take base line readings with electronic monitoring devices to establish conditions prior to commencement of investigation
Take base line photographs to establish conditions prior to commencement of investigation
Secure location against physical contamination
Set up audio, video and monitoring equipment
Attempt to recreate potential evidence that was identified during investigation
Take base line photographs to establish conditions at termination of investigation
4) Undertake further research based on information provided
Undertake additional research, based on client interview or any additional information obtained during investigation
5) Assess evidence
Determine legitimacy of witness statements by cross checking with known facts, and any independently obtained information provided by other witnesses
Assess evidence collected during physical investigation to determine its legitimacy and weather further investigation is required
Determine legitimacy of any photographic or audio evidence obtained during investigation
Attempt to recreate evidence through explainable means
Assess how comparable conditions of recreation are to original conditions. Unless identical this may preclude legitimacy of recreation
Determine if recreation discredits the evidence
6) Present client with information
Present client with results of investigation
Provide client with overview of how evidence was assessed
If necessary attempt to further recreate evidence in original environment
7) Document for peer review
If approved by client make evidence from investigation available for peer review
If as a result of peer review validity of evidence is compromised, update client with outcome
8) Establish ongoing contact with client
Follow up with client periodically to determine if further investigation is warranted
Definition of a haunting in this context
A haunting refers to evidence of conscious entity that has survived physical death, commonly referred to as an apparition.
Definition of Paranormal in this context
The paranormal refers to unexplained phenomena currently beyond the understanding of conventional science. Specific paranormal phenomena could be considered a haunting when a definitive link has been established between the two.
A hypothesis of a haunting.
Upon physical death, the electrical energy that forms our consciousness may not in fact dissipate but manifests as an apparition.
A haunting could be an entirely biological process not a metaphysical one.
Apparitions may exist in the same physical space as we do, but in a parallel dimension.
Our brains while we are alive, limit us to experiencing 3 dimensions that of height, width and depth, another dimension could exist which under normal circumstances we cannot perceive either physically or mentally.
Why are there no “Caveman ghosts”? There could be several reasons for this. If ghosts exist in a parallel dimension, perhaps it has geographical limitations the same as this one. The older apparitions may be physically so far away from this dimension that they are never seen. Perhaps because the physical locations and conditions that were a part of their existence no longer exist they have no reason to visit this dimension in this time. If apparitions are a form of conscious electrical energy, they may posses the ability to manipulate that energy into light, temperature or sound. This process may explain the reported interfere with electrical equipment, in addition to unexplained hot or cold spots or noise. If they can manipulate light, apparitions could create not just their own appearance but also that of inanimate objects.
Under extreme conditions, this internal conscious electrical energy may manifest while someone is still alive in the form of a psychic projection. This could account for apparitions of the living.
If apparitions do not obey our laws of physics, then it may never be possible for a scientific community that is bound by these laws to provide proof of their existence.
An apparition may be present at all times but can only be seen under certain conditions. These conditions may be dictated by the individual observing them. This could account for why one person can see an apparition while in the same vicinity as someone that can’t.
An apparition may be present all the time but can only see us under certain conditions. This may account for the occasions when although we can see them, they don’t appear to interact with us.
If you assume that an apparition is conscious physical energy and retains the emotional capability that it did when alive, the idea that it doesn’t have the mental capacity to realize that it is dead seems highly unlikely.
Apparitions have been recorded previous to the invention of electricity; although they may be a form of electrical energy the theory that they use electricity to manifest is improbable. But their presence could cause interference with electronic devices.
The stone tape theory implies that a certain type of haunting, known as a residual haunting may be just a replay of past events. This would account for the repetitious non interactive nature of the manifestation. But just as in life, an apparition may in fact be performing a repetitious task, which it continued at the same location. The fact that it may not be able to see us, could explain why it shows no interaction, and also this raises the possibility that there is no such occurrence as a residual haunting.
Apparitions do not require darkness to manifest, the large number of sightings made during the day contradict this.
A hypotheses of the paranormal
The paranormal doesn’t necessarily have any connection to a haunting. Independently much of what is classified as paranormal has no bearing to a conscious entity that has survived death.
An incident that is considered paranormal may have relevance to physics, astronomy or biology and may just be a natural process that is as yet unexplained by one of theses sciences. In order to for paranormal phenomena to be classified as haunted a definitive link must be established between the two.
The single most credible evidence in paranormal field research is photographic. It is a common misconception that being able to recreate a photograph or video invalidates it.
Recreation is not photo analysis. Just as a crime scene investigator wouldn’t dismiss evidence on the basis of being able to recreate it neither should anyone involved in paranormal research.
Being able to determine the validity of a photograph or video is a specialized process. I have many years experience both in photography and video, but in the event of an exceptional piece of evidence such as the recording of a full apparition I would pass such evidence on to a professional analyst.
It is always preferable to get multiple forms of evidence that validate each other, but many forms of evidence have no significance on a standalone basis. Photographic evidence is a format that does.
Other forms of paranormal research outside the bounds of field investigation
There are other forms of research into the survival of consciousness after physical death. These include near death experience and the controlled use of psychics. In most circumstances these are not practical avenues that can be pursued in field research.
Scientific method in the context of paranormal Investigation
1) Define the Question
To provide evidence of a of conscious entity that has survived physical death
2) Gather information
Research possible explanations for the cause, origin and true nature of a haunting or paranormal occurrence.
3) Form a Hypotheses
What are the expected results based on the information that has been gathered.
4) Perform experiment
Physical investigation of a location.
5) Analyze data
Examine the evidence, to see if the experiment has met the hypotheses.
6) Peer review
Allow your evidence, methodology, and theory to be reviewed by others.
7) Retest and refine
Repeat the process.
8) Establish a theory
From the evidence that has been gathered provide an answer to the question that has been posed.
Defining the source, the quest for credible evidence
The most valid evidence is that which has multiple collaborative sources. But while some forms or evidence will stand alone, there are many examples which independently have little or no validity. Evidence cannot become valid because of an association with a location or event, association is not a scientific protocol because it is not a definitive link. There is no one piece of evidence that can provide absolute proof, but the type of evidence presented can range from highly credible, to false.
The issue with any evidence in regard to the paranormal or haunting’s is defining its source. Some of the evidence that is most commonly presented is changes in temperature and fluctuations from E.M.F meters. But it is only referenced because they occurred in a haunted location. This is an association, not proof of relevance. There are numerous other possibilities for these occurrences, but because people are hunting for ghosts at somewhere supposedly haunted they chose to select that as an explanation. In addition to a haunting there are other origins that can’t be dismissed and if you can’t dismiss them you cannot have a definitive source.
A) The origin could be a psychic imprint from a living person either the client that is being investigated or the investigator themselves.
B) It could be an unexplained natural source.
C) It could be an unexplained man-made source.
If you cannot eliminate these then the evidence is purely circumstantial. The job of an investigator is not to prove a haunting and it’s not to disprove a haunting, either one injects what is referred to as the experimenter effect. This is a bias towards a predetermined outcome instead of an evaluation of the evidence resulting from the investigation process.
If your objectives are to find credible evidence of survival after death then you have to be able to eliminate the possibility of conscious or subconscious psychic intervention, by a living person. Although this in itself may be considered paranormal it can’t be considered evidence of a haunting if its source is not from someone that is known to be dead.
The possibility of psychic intervention from the living has to be considered as a possibility in all forms of evidence in regard to a haunting, including, E.V.P’s, photographs, E.M.F readings, and the movement of objects. Although this may seem improbable it is less improbable then the origins being from someone that is dead.
In the case of a reading from an E.M.F meter or a digital thermometer to have a definitive link with an apparition it would have to be beyond chance. If in a haunted location a E.M.F meter went off 49 times and on the 50th time, it went off at exactly the same time that an apparition appeared this still doesn’t prove that there is a connection between the two. It would just mean that the meter kept going off until an apparition appeared, not that it went off when an apparition appeared. These are two completely different scenarios, and they could also apply to temperature readings, and numerous other evidence presented as being proof of a haunting.
You are taking a vast leap from the source originating from the living to it originating from the dead. That is why the highest level evidence is that in which you can both narrow its origin and establish a link with your objective. Scientists don’t conclude that the ultra violet light spectrum that originates from the sun comes from there purely on the basis that the sun happened to be in the sky at the time they were doing their research. By the same token if you research a haunted house and find that someone died there you can’t you automatically assume that any unexplained phenomena is due to a dead person unless you can prove there is a connection. Geographical association is not proof.
Scale of potential evidence
1) Interacting full apparition caught on multiple video cameras, dead person, and unknown to person filming it
2) Interacting full apparition caught on single video camera, dead person, and unknown to person filming it
3) Interacting full apparition caught on video camera, dead person, and known to person filming it
4) Interacting full apparition caught on digital film, dead person, and unknown to person filming it
5) Non interacting full apparition caught on video, dead person, unknown to person filming it
6) Non interacting full apparition caught on video, dead person, known to person filming it
7) Non interacting full apparition caught on digital film dead person, known to person filming it
8) Object being moved, in presence of apparition
9) E.V.P, with verifiable verbal incantations of a dead person, message received contains information not known to person doing the recording
10) E.V.P, with verifiable verbal incantations of a dead person, message received contains information known to person doing the recording
11) E.V.P, message received contains information not known to person doing the recording
12) E.V.P, message received that is response to a specific question
13) E.V.P, message received contains information that person doing recording did know
14) Physical object appearing and disappearing capturing on video
15) Non physical object appearing and disappearing captured on video
16) Object being moved when requested, and also recorded on video
17) Object being moved and also recorded on video
18) Physical object appearing and disappearing
19) Object being moved when requested
20) Object being moved
21) Unexplained sounds heard and also picked up on recording device
22) Unexplained sounds heard but not picked up on recording device
23) Multiple first hand witness accounts of an apparition
24) Unexplained mist seen inside location
25) Unexplained odor with link to dead person
26) Unexplained odors
27) Single first hand witness account of an apparition
28) Individuals experiencing physical manifestations such as being touched
29) Individual psychic impressions without controlled test conditions
30) Individual’s experiencing the feeling of being watched
31) Individuals experiencing physical symptoms such as nausea
32) Individuals experiencing unexplained feelings of being hot or cold
33) Unexplained mist seen outside
34) Animal reacting strangely in haunted location
35) Unexplained electrical disturbances
36) Photographic or video evidence of orbs, streaks of light, mists or other false anomalies
37) Rise or fall in temperature drop with no collaborating phenomena
38) Rise or fall in E.M.F reading with no collaborating phenomena
39) Battery drain with no collaborating phenomena
40) Claims made by self proclaimed psychics in controlled test conditions
Techniques For Paranormal Investigation – A.S.S.A.P
Ghost Teams In Your Area – Ghoststop
Find a Paranormal Investigation Team In The U.K – British Paranormal Association
Ghost Hunting Groups – Paranormal Societies
A Skeptical Look At The Unexplained – I Am Kenny Biddle
Paranormal Investigation In Hampshire And Southern England – Paranormal Adventures